Thursday, March 12, 2009

Mindstorm 'Bottica'

input |ˈinˌpoŏt| précis

Character Bot
_____________

'explore and apply principles of robotics to demonstrate character elements'

throughput |ˈθroōˌpoŏt| passage

Taking the Chessbot from the previous exercise, our group discussed and sourced frog-like qualities to apply as possible defining characteristics. We jotted a list of variables from internet links/images as well as personal 'markers' (individual evocations). Arising from our reference material we extracted specific criteria to convey the 'energy' of our bot while attempting to capture a structural resemblance, which could be later 'dressed' aesthetically (with other materials). Eventually these became assigned controls incorporating; jumping ability/slow sedentary movement(s)/observation through turning. This translated as a sequence:

1) movement=backwards/forwards 2) orientate=rotate 3) 'dynamic' gesture=jump up and down

output |ˈoutˌpoŏt| arriveé

We managed to construct an extension (of levers) to 2 of the motors which generated enough power to lift it up/down (simulating jumping). The linear movements became small increments of the wheels (alternating) to produce a 'shuffle' and lethargic quality. The turn was basically a rotation of a single wheel. For the presentation we expanded on the ability to jump by attaching an ultrasonic sensor to initiate this action, by dangling an inpromptu 'fly' to the fore....and this hopefully conveyed recognition of prey. An audio file 'hooray!' also sounded before the jump activated, lending to an appropriate response by our character which then moved towards the trigger. (I noted afterwards how this could have resembled a 'reverse retraction' of the frog's tongue).


reflections |riˈflek sh ənz| moi-même
Aesthetically, it was remarked that our jumping 'legs' could actually have been put at the rear of the unit to produce a more visual effect and utilising a plastic ball (somehow!) may have enabled a more stressed hop/jump/(even) flip. Interestingly, Tarei programmed a random loop inside a larger loop so essentially a subset effect facilitated potential subtleties in behavioural movement. I found also, that our group engaged more efficiently through attempting to identify concrete themes more quickly, making our collective objective seem clearer. This felt better in that; a sense of co-operation and 'inclusion' manifested itself - in a more natural way.

1 comment:

  1. Jason, this is great the way you are describing whole process and outcomes including your interpretation. I'm not sure if it is intentional that you don't have any visuals or something rather technical. Your verbal skills are very strong, so text is quite clear but considering the "outsiders" that might follow the blog it'd be great to add a bit more visuals, you can also link from others' with reference.
    Cheers
    Evren Uzer

    ReplyDelete